‹ Back

Dr. Carthage Smith

Lead Coordinator, Global Science Forum OECD


  … (more)


Carthage Smith joined the OECD as head of the Global Science Forum (GSF) Secretariat in June 2014. He is responsible for working with national members to define the overall strategy and priorities for the Forum. This includes policy work on research infrastructures, Open Science, research funding mechanisms and science advisory processes.

Carthage was originally trained as a biochemist, with a PhD in neuroscience (Newcastle University, UK). Prior to joining the GSF secretariat, he was Deputy Executive Director of the International Council for Science (ICSU, Paris) for twelve years.  In this position he led the strategic development of a number of major global science initiatives.  Before moving to France, he spent six years at the UK Medical Research Council, where he was Head of International Cooperation.


There are a multiple definitions of resilience for different situations and from different… (more)

There are a multiple definitions of resilience for different situations and from different scientific disciplines. They all have at their core the ability of a system to react and respond effectively to threats or disturbance. Adaptation to external drivers and pressures is a critical aspect of resilience.  Mathematical models can be used to measure and analyse some types of resilience but it is a field in which what you can measure is not always important and what is important cannot always be measured.   As the science of resilience develops to provide an alternative and/or complement to more traditional risk assessment approaches in areas such as disaster management, it is also timely to turn the spotlight the other way and consider the resilience of science systems themselves.  Many would argue that science is under threat and needs to rapidly adapt to a number of important external drivers. Indeed, some would argue that science is in crisis in a post-truth world, where scientific 'breakthroughs' are increasingly over-hyped and  under-substantiated.  So how can our science systems adapt and change to better cope with the pressures and demands that we put on them? How can we build resilience into science as an essential pre-condition for science to function effectively in the service of society?